Jp. Pfammatter et al., EFFICACY AND PROARRHYTHMIA OF ORAL SOTALOL IN PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 26(4), 1995, pp. 1002-1007
Objectives. This study sought to assess the efficacy of oral sotalol f
or various arrhythmias in pediatric patients and to evaluate the incid
ence of proarrhythmia and systemic side effects. Background. Sotalol i
s a beta-adrenergic blocking agent with additional class III antiarrhy
thmic properties. Experience in pediatric patients is limited. Data co
ncerning the incidence of proarrhythmia in children are lacking. Metho
ds. Seventy-one pediatric patients (mean age 7.3 years) with various s
upraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias were treated with ora
l sotalol. All the patients were admitted to the hospital for initiati
on of sotalol therapy. Antiarrhythmic and proarrhythmic effects of sot
alol were assessed by daily surface electrocardiograms (ECGs) during t
he in-hospital phase and by serial Holter monitoring. Results. Sotalol
was either completely (27 [66%] of 41 patients) or partially effectiv
e (11 [27%] of 41) in 38 (93%) of 41 patients with supraventricular re
entrant tachycardias. In patients with atrial flutter predominantly af
ter operation for congenital heart disease, sotalol was effective in 8
4% of patients (completely in 9 of 19 and partially in 7 of 19). Ventr
icular tachycardia was completely (3 of 11) or partially (4 of 11) con
trolled in 61% of children. Proarrhythmia occurred in seven patients (
10%) and consisted of symptomatic bradycardia from sinoatrial block an
d high grade atrioventricular (AV) block, respectively, in two childre
n; asymptomatic high grade AV block in one; torsade de pointes in one;
and relevant increased ventricular ectopic activity in three. Proarrh
ythmia required drug discontinuation in four patients. Mean duration o
f treatment for all patients was 18 months (range 1 to 40). Conclusion
s. Sotalol was an effective antiarrhythmic drug for a wide range of pe
diatric tachyarrhythmias. The considerable number of patients with pro
arrhythmic effects indicates the need for initiation of treatment on a
n inpatient basis and close monitoring by serial Holter electrocardiog
raphy.