Jy. Phelps et al., ACCURACY AND INTRAOBSERVER VARIABILITY OF SIMULATED CERVICAL DILATATION MEASUREMENTS, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 173(3), 1995, pp. 942-945
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess the accuracy and intraobserver va
riability of clinical cervical diameter measurements among obstetric h
ealth care providers. STUDY DESIGN: Polyvinyl chloride pipes 1 to 10 c
m in diameter were mounted in cardboard boxes and used to simulate cer
vical examinations. The boxes were designed so that the examiner had t
o rely solely on proprioception to determine the inner diameter. RESUL
TS: A total of 1574 simulated cervical diameter measurements were obta
ined from 102 different examiners in a two-part study. The overall acc
uracy for determining the exact diameter was 56.3%, which improved to
89.5% when an error of ii cm was allowed. Intraobserver variability fo
r a given diameter measurement was 52.1%, which decreased to 10.5% whe
n an error of +/- 1 cm was allowed.CONCLUSIONS: Cervical diameter meas
urements obtained by digital examination are precise when an error of
+/- 1 cm is allowed for. Intraobserver variability is > 50% and is an
important consideration when evaluating dysfunctional labor.