LYMPH-DRAINAGE AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF POST-RECONSTRUCTIVE LEG EDEMA IS NOT INFLUENCED BY THE TYPE OF INGUINAL INCISION - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING FEMOROPOPLITEAL BYPASS-SURGERY
R. Haaverstad et al., LYMPH-DRAINAGE AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF POST-RECONSTRUCTIVE LEG EDEMA IS NOT INFLUENCED BY THE TYPE OF INGUINAL INCISION - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING FEMOROPOPLITEAL BYPASS-SURGERY, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 10(3), 1995, pp. 316-322
Objectives: To see whether the type of groin incision influenced the d
egree of postoperative leg oedema and the occurrence of lymphatic dama
ge. Design: Prospective randomised clinical study. Setting: University
Department of Surgery Materials: Twenty-four patients undergoing femo
ropopliteal bypass reconstruction with either a lateral groin incision
(Group A, n = 12) or a direct incision over the femoral vessels (Grou
p B, n = 12). Chief outcome measures: The leg volume increase was meas
ured according to the formula of a truncated cone. Deep venous thrombo
sis was excluded by air plethysmography and colour-coded Duplex scanni
ng. Lymphatic lesions were detected by lymphoscintigraphy using Tc-99m
labelled human serum albumin. Main results: One week following vascul
ar reconstruction the median leg volume increase was 24.5% in Group A
vs. 23.3% in Group B (NS). Lymphoscintigraphy revealed obstruction of
the lymphatics in five patients of Group A vs. three patients of Group
B (Ns). Neither the occurrence of lymph cysts nor extravasation of ly
mph differed between the two groups. In seven patients no lymphatic le
sion was observed. Patients with interruption of the lymphatics (n = 8
) had a higher leg volume increase compared to the remaining patients
with no or minor lymphatic lesions, 31.2% vs. 19.6%, respectively (p<0
.05). Conclusions: Leg oedema and the occurrence of lymphatic damage f
ollowing femoropopliteal bypass surgery is not reduced by applying a l
ateral approach to the femoral artery in the groin. However, the highe
r leg volume increase in patients with lymphatic obstruction indicates
that lymphatic damage could play a part in the leg oedema formation.