CONTINUUM ELECTROSTATICS IN A COMPUTATIONAL UNIVERSE WITH FINITE CUTOFF RADII AND PERIODIC BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS - CORRECTION TO COMPUTED FREE-ENERGIES OF IONIC SOLVATION

Authors
Citation
Rh. Wood, CONTINUUM ELECTROSTATICS IN A COMPUTATIONAL UNIVERSE WITH FINITE CUTOFF RADII AND PERIODIC BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS - CORRECTION TO COMPUTED FREE-ENERGIES OF IONIC SOLVATION, The Journal of chemical physics, 103(14), 1995, pp. 6177-6187
Citations number
65
Categorie Soggetti
Physics, Atomic, Molecular & Chemical
ISSN journal
00219606
Volume
103
Issue
14
Year of publication
1995
Pages
6177 - 6187
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9606(1995)103:14<6177:CEIACU>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Many simulations of the free energy of hydration of an ion in a polar solvent are performed in truncated periodic systems in which electrost atic forces are truncated and periodic boundary conditions are used to eliminate surface effects. Simulations allow accurate calculation of the properties of the truncated Hamiltonian because there are no long- range forces present. However, in order to compare with the real unive rse, it is necessary to correct for the effects of both truncated pote ntials and periodic boundary conditions. A method of calculating the c ontinuum dielectric properties of a truncated periodic system is deriv ed and applied to the case of a single ion in a polar solvent. If the continuum model is accurate at distances where the effects of the trun cated potentials and periodic boundary conditions are significant, the n the correction will be accurate and it will include all the effects of the truncated ion-solvent and solvent-solvent potentials, as well a s the effects of the periodic boundary conditions. When the simulation s of Straatsma and Berendsen [J. Chem. Phys. 89, 5876 (1988)] for the Ne(aq) to Na+(aq) transformation at 298 K and 0.1 MPa are corrected in this manner, the calculations with different cutoff radii between 0.9 and 1.2 nm and different periodic cell size give the same corrected r esult within experimental error. Similarly, Aqvist's [J. Phys. Chem. 9 8, 8253 (1994)] calculations for a different model of the Ne(aq) to Na +(aq) transformation with periodic boundary conditions and varying cut off schemes give self-consistent results, but these results are differ ent from his results for the same model using the surface constrained all atom solvent method. Possible reasons for this discrepancy are dis cussed. (C) 1995 American Institute of Physics.