AN ACCOUNT OF AUSTROLITHON INTUMESCENS GEN ET SP-NOV AND BOREOLITHON VAN-HEURCKII (HEYDRICH) GEN ET COMB-NOV (AUSTROLITHOIDEAE SUBFAM NOV, CORALLINACEAE, RHODOPHYTA)
As. Harvey et Wj. Woelkerling, AN ACCOUNT OF AUSTROLITHON INTUMESCENS GEN ET SP-NOV AND BOREOLITHON VAN-HEURCKII (HEYDRICH) GEN ET COMB-NOV (AUSTROLITHOIDEAE SUBFAM NOV, CORALLINACEAE, RHODOPHYTA), Phycologia, 34(5), 1995, pp. 362-382
The Austrolithoideae (subfam. nov.), comprising Austrolithon (gen. nov
.) and Boreolithon (gen. nov.), differs from other subfamilies in the
Corallinaceae (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) in possessing multiporate tet
rasporangial conceptacles and in lacking cell fusions, secondary pit c
onnections and genicula. Austrolithon and Boreolithon both include sin
gle known species: A. intumescens (sp. nov.) from southern Australia a
nd B. van-heurckii (comb. nov.) from the British Isles and France. Aus
trolithon and Boreolithon differ in growth form (unconsolidated vs. en
crusting), habit (almost entirely endophytic vs. epigenous) and thallu
s construction (partly diffuse and partly pseudoparenchymatous and mon
omerous vs, largely pseudoparenchymatous and dimerous). Type material
of both species was examined. A detailed morphological and anatomical
account of Austrolithon intumescens is provided and new data are prese
nted for Boreolithon van-heurckii. Information on etymology, collectio
ns examined, and distribution, seasonality and habitat is also include
d for both species, and Austrolithon intumescens is compared with othe
r endophytic Corallinaceae. Eight subfamilies of Corallinaceae are now
recognized, based on phenetic comparisons; similarities and differenc
es are considered briefly.