We report the effects of different forms of cue on a patient who shows
left neglect when processing single objects and right neglect when ad
dressing separate actions to independent objects (Riddoch et al., this
issue). Visual cues were found to reduce neglect within single object
s but not between separate objects; motor cues reduced neglect between
separate objects but not within single objects. We discuss the releva
nce of these independent cueing effects for understanding the nature o
f the spatial deficit within this patient, and for attempts to rehabil
itate neglect by cueing.