RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING ORAL CIPROFLOXACIN PLUS PENICILLIN-V WITH AMIKACIN PLUS CARBENICILLIN OR CEFTAZIDIME FOR EMPIRICAL-TREATMENT OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC CANCER-PATIENTS
E. Velasco et al., RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING ORAL CIPROFLOXACIN PLUS PENICILLIN-V WITH AMIKACIN PLUS CARBENICILLIN OR CEFTAZIDIME FOR EMPIRICAL-TREATMENT OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC CANCER-PATIENTS, American journal of clinical oncology, 18(5), 1995, pp. 429-435
Aminoglycoside-containing combination therapy has been the standard em
pirical approach for febrile neutropenic cancer patients. With the adv
ent of the broad-spectrum oral fluoroquinolones, it is now possible to
evaluate an initial empirical alternative therapy. A prospective rand
omized study was conducted comparing oral ciprofloxacin plus penicilli
n V (group A) with amikacin plus carbenicillin or ceftazidime (group B
), Main criteria for eligibility were febrile patients with solid tumo
r or nonlymphoblastic lymphoma, a Zubrod PS equal to 1 or 2, no diarrh
ea, mucositis, or long-term central venous catheter. A total of 108 co
nsecutive neutropenic febrile episodes were randomized (5 exclusions);
55 episodes were assigned to group A and 48 to group B. Most febrile
episodes were of unknown origin. There were 10 microbiologically docum
ented episodes with two cases of bacteremia. Both regimens were well t
olerated. Oral regimen was substantially cheaper than parenteral regim
en. Treatment success without regimen modification was 94.5% for group
A and 93.8% for group B (p =.86; CI -0.08-0.10). Oral therapy with ci
profloxacin and penicillin V is a safe alternative to standard parente
ral therapy in this low-risk group of neutropenic patients, with unque
stionable cost containment.