H. Elbeheiry et al., PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST THE SYSTEMIC HYPOTENSION INDUCED BY PROPOFOL DURING RAPID-SEQUENCE INTUBATION, Canadian journal of anaesthesia, 42(10), 1995, pp. 875-878
The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of two
prophylactic approaches against the anticipated hypotension induced by
propofol during rapid-sequence intubation. Thirty-six male or female
nonpremedicated ASA class I-II patients aged 21-60 yr undergoing elect
ive outpatient surgery were included in the study. Patients were rando
mly allocated to receive pre-induction ephedrine sulphate (70 mu g . k
g(-1) iv), preinduction volume loading (12 ml . kg(-1) Ringer's lactat
e) or no treatment. Rapid-sequence intubation with cricoid pressure wa
s then performed with propofol (2.5 mg . kg(-1) and succinylcholine (1
.5 mg . kg(-1). The lungs were subsequently ventilated with 0.25-0.5%
isoflurane in a 2:1 N2O/O-2 mixture. Vecuronium was given once neuromu
scular function had recovered from the succinylcholine. Heart rate and
systemic arterial blood pressure were measured non-invasively before
induction, after propofol administration and every minute for ten minu
tes after intubation. Pre-induction volume loading prevented the hypot
ension observed before surgical stimulation in control and ephedrine g
roups. Moreover pre-induction volume loading was not associated with i
ncreases in heart rate after intubation as was ephedrine administratio
n. The intubating conditions were excellent to satisfactory in most pa
tients and the overall incidence of adverse events during induction wa
s mainly due to pain during injection of propofol. The present study s
howed that preoperative volume loading is more efficacious than preind
uction administration of ephedrine sulphate in maintaining haemodynami
c stability during rapid-sequence induction with propofol and succinyl
choline. In addition propofol in combination with succinylcholine prov
ides excellent conditions for rapid-sequence intubation.