ANALYSIS OF LIGAND-BINDING TO THE ALPHA(2)-MACROGLOBULIN RECEPTOR LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN RECEPTOR-RELATED PROTEIN - EVIDENCE THAT LIPOPROTEIN LIPASE AND THE CARBOXYL-TERMINAL DOMAIN OF THE RECEPTOR-ASSOCIATEDPROTEIN BIND TO THE SAME SITE
Ms. Nielsen et al., ANALYSIS OF LIGAND-BINDING TO THE ALPHA(2)-MACROGLOBULIN RECEPTOR LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN RECEPTOR-RELATED PROTEIN - EVIDENCE THAT LIPOPROTEIN LIPASE AND THE CARBOXYL-TERMINAL DOMAIN OF THE RECEPTOR-ASSOCIATEDPROTEIN BIND TO THE SAME SITE, The Journal of biological chemistry, 270(40), 1995, pp. 23713-23719
The endocytic alpha(2)-macroglobulin receptor/low density lipoprotein
receptor-related protein (alpha(2)MR/LRP) binds several classes of ext
racellular ligands at independent sites. In addition, alpha(2)MR/LRP c
an bind multiple copies of the 39-40-kDa receptor-associated protein (
RAP). Both amino-terminal and carboxyl-terminal fragments of RAP exhib
it affinity, and the fragments apparently bind to different sites on t
he receptor. RAP completely inhibits the binding of all presently know
n extracellular ligands, whereas several ligands such as alpha(2)-macr
oglobulin and tissue type plasminogen activator are poor inhibitors of
RAP binding. Since RAP is largely an intracellular molecule that norm
ally does not occupy alpha(2)MR/LRP at the cell surface, we hypothesiz
ed that an established extracellular ligand might bind to those sites
on the receptor capable of binding the RAP fragments. We found complet
e cross competition between carboxyl-terminal RAP fragments and fragme
nts of lipoprotein lipase containing the recently identified binding d
omain for alpha(2)MR/LRP (Nykjaer, A., Nielsen, M., Lookene, A., Meyer
, N., Roigaard, H., Etzerodt, M., Beisiegel, U., Olivecrona, G., and G
liemann, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 31747-31755). Moreover, the lip
oprotein lipase fragment completely inhibited the binding of several a
lpha(2)MR/LRP ligands in a pattern similar to that of carboxyl-termina
l RAP fragments. On the other hand, the amino-terminal RAP fragment wa
s a poor competitor of binding of the lipoprotein lipase fragment, whe
reas it competed effectively with pro-uPA for bind ing to the receptor
. The results provide evidence that lipoprotein lipase binds to the si
te on alpha(2)MR/LRP also available for binding of the carboxyl termin
al domain of RAP and suggest that pro-uPA may bind to or overlap the s
ite available for the amino-terminal domain of RAP.