U. Creutzig et al., CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF SURFACE-ANTIGEN EXPRESSION IN CHILDREN WITH ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA - RESULTS OF STUDY AML-BFM-87, Blood, 86(8), 1995, pp. 3097-3108
Immunophenotyping using a panel of 15 antibodies was performed in 267
(87%) and cytogenetic analysis in 196 (64%) of 307 children under 17 y
ears of age enrolled in the AML-BFM-87 study. Treatment consisted of c
ytosine arabinoside, daunorubicin, etoposide induction and a 6-week se
ven-drug consolidation chemotherapy, followed by two blocks of high-do
se cytosine arabinoside with or without cranial irradiation and mainte
nance therapy for 1 year. Five-year event-free survival for patients w
ith immunophenotypic data was .43 +/- .03 SE. The diagnostic value of
the pan-myeloid reagents CD13, CD33, and CDw65 for the recognition of
childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was high with a sensitivity of
98% (positivity of at least one of these antigens), whereas, with the
exception of CD41 for French American British (FAB) subtype M7, the ex
pression of single cell-surface antigens showed no correlation with mo
rphologic or cytogenetic subgroups. On the other hand, characteristic
subgroups of AML defined by morphologic features and karyotypes could
be described by low or high rates of surface antigen expression compar
ed with those of other patients. These immunophenotypic features most
probably associated with specific entities include expression of CD34
or CD13 and absence of CD14 or CD4 in M2 with Auer rods/t(8;21); absen
ce of HLA-DR, CD34, and CD14, but expression of CD33 in M3/t(15;17); p
ositivity of either CD34 or CD13 and either CD14 or CD2 for M4Eo/inv(1
6); and absence of either CD34 or CD13 and expression of either CD33 o
r CDw65 and either CD15 or CD4 for M5/t(9;11). In FAB M0, negativity o
f one or two of the three panmyeloid-associated markers (CD13/33/w65)
was common; and cytogenetic results frequently showed random abnormali
ties. Expression of lymphoid-, progenitor- and most myeloid-associated
antigens had no influence on the prognosis, whereas the outcome was s
ignificantly better for children with M2 with Auer rods, M3, or M4Eo o
r for those with the associated karyotypes t(8;21),t(15;17) and inv(16
) than for other patients. (C) 1995 by The American Society of Hematol
ogy.