W. Alberti et al., CHEMOTHERAPY IN NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - A METAANALYSIS USING UPDATED DATA ON INDIVIDUAL PATIENTS FROM 52 RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS, BMJ. British medical journal, 311(7010), 1995, pp. 899-909
Objective-To evaluate the effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on survival
in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Design-Meta-analysis usi
ng updated data on individual patients from all available randomised t
rials, both published and unpublished. Subjects-9387 patients (7151 de
aths) from 52 randomised clinical trials. Main outcome measure-Surviva
l. Results-The results for modern regimens containing cisplatin favour
ed chemotherapy in all comparisons and reached conventional levels of
significance when used with radical radiotherapy and with supportive c
are. Trials comparing surgery with surgery plus chemotherapy gave a ha
zard ratio of 0.87 (13% reduction in the risk of death, equivalent to
an absolute benefit of 5% at five years). Trials comparing radical rad
iotherapy with radical radiotherapy plus chemotherapy gave a hazard ra
tio of 0.87 (13% reduction in the risk of death; absolute benefit of 4
% at two years), and trials comparing supportive care with supportive
care plus chemotherapy 0.73 (27% reduction in the risk of death; 10% i
mprovement in survival at one year). The essential drugs needed to ach
ieve these effects were not identified. No difference in the size of e
ffect was seen in any subgroup of patients. In all but the radical rad
iotherapy setting, older trials using long term alkylating agents tend
ed to show a detrimental effect of chemotherapy. This effect reached c
onventional significance in the adjuvant surgical comparison. Conclusi
on-At the outset of this meta-analysis there was considerable pessimis
m about the role of chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. These
results offer hope of progress and suggest that chemotherapy may have
a role in treating this disease.