F. Schuind et al., LOOSE-HINGE TOTAL ELBOW ARTHROPLASTY - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF IMPLANT ALIGNMENT ON 3-DIMENSIONAL ELBOW KINEMATICS, The Journal of arthroplasty, 10(5), 1995, pp. 670-678
A previous study suggested that the kinematics of a loose-hinge total
elbow arthroplasty (TEA) are those of a truly semiconstrained joint. T
his study addresses the effects of malposition of the implant. The thr
ee-dimensional elbow kinematics during simulated active motion were st
udied in six cadaver specimens using an electromagnetic tracking devic
e. In addition to simulated active elbow flexion, flexion arcs were ob
tained under an elbow varus or valgus moment, to calculate the structu
ral varus-valgus laxities. The results after four different Coonrad-Mo
rrey TEA positions of implantation were compared with those of the int
act elbow. The flexion-extension amplitudes were not significantly dec
reased after TEA implantation, except with external rotation of the ul
nar component, which resulted in a loss of extension. In the intact el
bow and after TEA implantation in any position, the mean varus-valgus
deviations throughout elbow flexion were in a narrower range than the
structural limits imposed by the ligaments (intact elbow) or the TEA h
inge design. With internal malrotation of the humeral component over 1
0 degrees, however, the valgus structural limit was reached and, conve
rsely, the varus limit with external rotation over 10 degrees. The cli
nical improvement observed with the semiconstrained TEA is derived fro
m the benefits of the less constrained articulation. The proximodistal
changes of TEA implantation have no consequence on the kinematic patt
ern. Rotational malpositioning of either humeral or ulnar component sh
ould be avoided, the first because it changes the kinematic pattern to
ward the structural limits of the implant and, therefore, may lead to
excessive stresses at the bone-cement-implant interfaces and to early
loosening, and the latter because it causes loss of extension.