Past studies have demonstrated that birds' perceived risk of predation
is influenced by habitat structure, notably the availability of a ref
uge and the location of food. Thus apparently dangerous habitats, such
as those without a refuge, may act as stressors to birds. We test the
hypothesis that habitat structure influences stress by manipulating c
over availability and food location in European starlings, Sturnus vul
garis, housed in large flight aviaries during moult. We use degree of
fluctuating asymmetry (FA) and the number of fault bars in primary fea
thers to measure stress. The manipulations had no effect on the overal
l timing or rate of moult, or on the final size and shape of the wings
. However, birds from aviaries with cover had lower levels of FA and f
ewer faults than birds from aviaries without cover. Food location also
influenced FA, With birds from aviaries with food located near to cov
er having lower levels of asymmetry;however, this effect was weak and
transitory, only influencing the first primary growth during moult. Fo
od location did not influence the number of fault bars. These results
indicate that manipulations of habitat structure can influence stress.
Although plumage development may be influenced by perceived risk of p
redation per se, the possible role of other proximate determinants of
plumage abnormalities such as changes in feeding patterns, activity le
vels, and incidence of mechanical damage are also considered.