The most striking arguments in favor of a T cell dependent nature of R
A are the strong association of the disease with selected class II HLA
haplotypes (the ''shared epitope'' hypothesis) and the fact that, in
experimental animal models such as adjuvant arthritis, the disease can
be transferred by isolated T cell lines. It is true that T cell activ
ation at the site of inflammation is not excessive. However, there is
now unequivocal evidence for focal synthesis of IL-2 and IFN-gamma in
the RA synovial membrane and one may realise that a limited but specif
ic T cell activation may be sufficient to induce or perpetuate the imm
une process, This same argument may explain the lack of clear TCR rest
riction at the sites of inflammation. Untill now no antigen has been d
emonstrated to initiate and/or perpetuate RA. Different antigens thoug
h have been incriminated in the pathogenesis of RA, including cartilag
e antigens (collagen, proteoglycans, chondrocyte antigens), heat shock
proteins or exogenous (viral/bacterial) antigens. Unless one can pick
up the right antigen and clone the relevant T cells, it will be very
hard to directly prove a T cell-dependent nature of the disease.