Background: Lidocaine may be useful in the treatment of neuropathic pa
in states, The authors hypothesized that lidocaine would reduce tactil
e allodynia observed in a rat nerve injury model. In an effort to dete
rmine the site of drug action, effects after intravenous, intrathecal,
and regional administration were compared. Methods: Rats underwent li
gation of the left fifth and sixth lumbar spinal nerves. The 50% thres
holds (g) for left hind paw withdrawal of awake rats to von Frey hairs
were documented before, during, and after intravenous administration
of lidocaine at programmed/documented pseudo-steady-state plasma conce
ntrations, and correlated with measured plasma concentrations. Respons
es to lidocaine application intrathecally and regionally to the injure
d nerves were also recorded. Results: In rats with tactile allodynia,
intravenous lidocaine yielded 66 +/- 11% of the maximal possible effec
t on thresholds (100% = normal threshold), versus -1.3 +/- 2.7% for sa
line infusion. Twenty-one days after lidocaine infusion, 30-40% of the
maximal possible effect persisted. Threshold increases depended on pl
asma concentration, rather than quantity of drug administered: rats re
ceiving 15 mg/kg with higher plasma concentrations (1.2 +/- 0.1 mu g/m
l) showed significant allodynia suppression throughout 7 days of follo
w-up, whereas rats receiving 15 mg/kg at a slower rate with lower plas
ma concentrations (0.6 +/- 0.1 mu g/ml) did not. The EC(50) for acute
allodynia suppression was 0.75 mu g/ml. No such allodynia suppression
was seen after intrathecal or regional administration of lidocaine des
pite transient neural blockade. Conclusions: Intravenous, but not intr
athecal or regionally applied, lidocaine produces dose-dependent suppr
ession of allodynia associated with nerve injury. The effects far outl
ast plasma concentrations of lidocaine. The mechanism of these prolong
ed effects is unknown.