JAMES AND THE PHYSICAL BASIS OF EMOTION - A COMMENT ON ELLSWORTH

Citation
R. Reisenzein et al., JAMES AND THE PHYSICAL BASIS OF EMOTION - A COMMENT ON ELLSWORTH, Psychological review, 102(4), 1995, pp. 757-761
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology,Psychology
Journal title
ISSN journal
0033295X
Volume
102
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
757 - 761
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-295X(1995)102:4<757:JATPBO>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
It is argued that P. Ellsworth's (1994) interpretation of William Jame s's theory of emotions is not supported by his writings. On the basis of textual evidence and systematic considerations, the authors try to show that, in line with the traditional view, James's theory holds tha t emotions are identical with feelings of bodily changes, of which aut onomic changes are by far the most important ones (i.e., the only ones necessary and sufficient for emotions). Furthermore, the authors argu e that James's question of the temporal priority of emotions versus bo dily feelings makes good sense even if one acknowledges that these eve nts usually show temporal overlap.