It is argued that P. Ellsworth's (1994) interpretation of William Jame
s's theory of emotions is not supported by his writings. On the basis
of textual evidence and systematic considerations, the authors try to
show that, in line with the traditional view, James's theory holds tha
t emotions are identical with feelings of bodily changes, of which aut
onomic changes are by far the most important ones (i.e., the only ones
necessary and sufficient for emotions). Furthermore, the authors argu
e that James's question of the temporal priority of emotions versus bo
dily feelings makes good sense even if one acknowledges that these eve
nts usually show temporal overlap.