G. Makoul et al., HEALTH PROMOTION IN PRIMARY-CARE - PHYSICIAN-PATIENT COMMUNICATION AND DECISION-MAKING ABOUT PRESCRIPTION MEDICATIONS, Social science & medicine, 41(9), 1995, pp. 1241-1254
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Social Sciences, Biomedical","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
To examine health promotion in a primary-care context, we studied perc
eived and actual communication in 271 consultations between general pr
actitioners and patients in Oxford (England). Although health promotio
n is a term usually reserved For public-health or wellness programs, a
health promotion perspective enriches the examination of communicatio
n in physician-patient interactions by emphasizing issues of empowerme
nt, competence and control. Accordingly, we are interested in how comm
unication during medical encounters can improve patients' abilities to
exercise appropriate control over their health. A major factor in ena
bling patients to increase control over their health involves developi
ng their competencies for making decisions and enacting behaviors that
can lead to desired, and attainable, health outcomes. This report foc
uses on communication and decision making about prescription medicatio
ns, since whether and how to use medications are among the most common
and important decisions in which patients can participate. Five instr
uments were employed to collect data about physicians, patients and th
eir consultations: a Video Analysis, which allowed assessment of actua
l communication behavior; a Patient Questionnaire designed to gauge pe
rceptions of the encounter and collect demographic information; a Medi
cal-Record Review, which provided information on utilization, diagnosi
s and treatment; a Telephone Interview, conducted 14 days after the co
nsultation to obtain follow-up information (e.g. experience with the p
rescribed medication); and a Doctor Questionnaire that focused on atti
tudes toward consultations and patients. With respect to communication
about prescription medications, physicians most frequently mentioned
product name (78.2% of consultations) and instructions for use (86.7%
of consultations). Patients were extremely passive, rarely offering th
eir opinion or initiating discussion about any aspect of the treatment
. We suggest that improving patients' decision-making competencies may
require more discussion of benefits and risks, as well as discussion
of patients' opinions about the prescribed medications and their abili
ties to follow through with the treatment plans. The research design p
roved useful in highlighting discrepancies between perceived and actua
l communication. Physicians tended to overestimate the extent to which
they discussed patients' ability to follow the treatment plan, elicit
ed patients' opinion about the prescribed medication and discussed ris
ks of the medication. And, 24.3% of the patients left the consultation
with an 'illusion of competence', a belief that important topics had
been discussed when,in fact, they had not been mentioned at all. The p
attern of results illustrates the complexity of health promotion in pr
imary care, and underscores the importance of attending to both percei
ved and actual communication in medical encounters.