Mj. Kothari et al., ELECTROMYOGRAPHY - DO THE DIAGNOSTIC ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 76(10), 1995, pp. 947-949
Background: Physicians are sometimes reluctant to refer patients for e
lectrodiagnostic studies (electromyography with nerve conduction studi
es [EMG/NCS]) believing the test is too painful and of little benefit.
Methods: We performed two separate surveys on 126 and 100 consecutive
patients referred to our laboratory to determine if EMG/NCS was benef
icial to the referring physician and to compare the level of anxiety e
xperienced by patients before the study with the pain actually experie
nced during the study. Results: The electrodiagnosis was discordant fr
om the referring diagnosis in 39% of the patients with an abnormal EMG
/NCS. Pretest anxiety levels were low in 59% of the patients, medium i
n 27%, and high in 14%. After the tests, 82% of the patients said that
the test was not as bad as expected, and was generally only mildly pa
inful. Ninety-three responded that they would have the test performed
again. Conclusions: EMG/NCS often suggest alternative diagnoses, and t
he actual pain experienced during an EMG/NCS study is significantly le
ss than expected. (C) 1995 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation
Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitat
ion