THE LAST GLACIAL INTERGLACIAL RECORD OF RODENT REMAINS FROM THE GIGNYKARST SEQUENCE IN THE FRENCH JURA USED FOR PALEOCLIMATIC AND PALEOECOLOGICAL RECONSTRUCTIONS

Citation
J. Chaline et al., THE LAST GLACIAL INTERGLACIAL RECORD OF RODENT REMAINS FROM THE GIGNYKARST SEQUENCE IN THE FRENCH JURA USED FOR PALEOCLIMATIC AND PALEOECOLOGICAL RECONSTRUCTIONS, Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology, 117(3-4), 1995, pp. 229-252
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Paleontology
ISSN journal
00310182
Volume
117
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
229 - 252
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-0182(1995)117:3-4<229:TLGIRO>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
A multidisciplinary approach has produced an exceptional chronological log of climatic patterns for the Upper Pleistocene sequence of Gigny Cave (Jura, France) covering the Pre-Eemian, Eemian Interglacial, Midd le Glacial and Upper Pleniglacial, as well as a part of the Holocene. Multivariate analysis (correspondence and component analysis) of roden t associations from the sequence is used here to characterize the diff erent climatic stages in terms of relative temperature, plant cover an d moisture. Faunal analysis establishes: (1) positive and negative cor relations among the variations of the different species; (2) the signi ficance of axis 1 (component analysis) which, in terms of temperature, opposes cold environments with contrasted continental biotopes; (3a) the significance of axis 2 (component analysis), which reflects vegeta tion patterns ranging from open to closed habitats; (3b) the significa nce of axis 3 (component analysis), which expresses trends in moisture ; (4) various correlations between faunal and climatic parameters (tem perature, plant cover and moisture); (5) evaluation of faunal diversit y (Shannon index ranging from 0.74 to 2.27) showing that diversity inc reases with temperature and the complexity of vegetation, but is not s ensitive to moisture. Lastly, the comparison of multivariate methods w ith the weighted semi-quantitative Hokr method shows the complementari ty of the two approaches, the first methods quantifying climatic param eters while the second seems to provide more precise evaluations of th e main seasons of rainfall.