Cm. Bishop et Pj. Butler, PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELING OF OXYGEN-CONSUMPTION IN BIRDS DURING FLIGHT, Journal of Experimental Biology, 198(10), 1995, pp. 2153-2163
This study combines data on changes in cardiovascular variables with b
ody mass (M(b)) and with exercise intensity to model the oxygen supply
available to birds during flight. Its main purpose is to provide a fr
amework for identifying the factors involved in limiting aerobic power
input to birds during flight and to suggest which cardiovascular vari
ables are the most likely to have been influenced by natural selection
when considering both allometric and adaptive variation. It is argued
that natural selection has acted on heart rate (fH) and cardiac strok
e volume (VS), so that the difference in the arteriovenous oxygen cont
ent (CaO2-CVO2) in birds, both at rest and during flight, is independe
nt of M(b). Therefore, the M(b) exponent for oxygen consumption (VO2)
during flight can be estimated from measurements of heart rate and str
oke volume. Stroke volume is likely to be directly proportional to hea
rt mass (M(b)) and, using empirical data, values for the M(b) coeffici
ents and exponents of various cardiovascular variables are estimated.
It is concluded that, as found for mammals, fH is the main adaptive va
riable when considering allometric variation, although Mb also shows a
slight scaling effect. Relative Mb is likely to be the most important
when considering adaptive specialisations. The Fick equation may be r
epresented as: (VO2)M(b)(z) = (fH)M(b)(w) X (VS)M(b)(x) X (CaO2 - CVO2
)M(b)(y), where w, x, y, z are the body mass exponents for each variab
le and the terms in parentheses represent the M(b) coefficients. Utili
sing this formula and data from the literature, the scaling of minimum
V-O2 during flight for bird species with a 'high aerobic capacity' (e
xcluding hummingbirds) is calculated to be: 166M(b)(0.77+/-0.09) = 574
M(b)(-0.19+/-0.02) X 3.48M(b)(0.96+/-0.02) X 0.083M(b)(0.00+/-0.05), a
nd for hummingbirds (considered separately owing to their unique wing
kinematics) it is: 314M(b)(0.90+/-0.22) = 617M(b)(-0.10+/-0.06) X 6.13
M(b)(1.00+/-0.11) X 0.083M(b)(0.00+/-0.05). These results are largely
dependent on the cardiovascular values obtained from pigeons flying ne
ar to the minimum power speed of 10 ms(-1), but would appear to provid
e realistic values. Both the measured and the estimated VO2 for hummin
gbirds appear to scale with a larger M(b) exponent than that for all o
ther birds, and it is suggested that this is as a result of the larger
M(b) exponent for flight muscle mass as the larger species of humming
birds try to maintain hovering performance. It is proposed that estima
ted VO2 for birds during flight, which is based on Mb in combination w
ith estimates of fH and CaO2-CVO2, gives an indirect measure of relati
ve aerobic power input and, when corrected for the estimated scaling i
nfluences of the mechano-chemical conversion efficiency and lift gener
ation with respect to Mb, may be a useful indicator of the relative ca
pacity of the muscle to sustain power output and lift production durin
g flight.