D. Pickuth et U. Leutloff, SELECTED USE OF INTRAOPERATIVE CHOLANGIOG RAPHY DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie, 380(5), 1995, pp. 299-301
Routine use of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic chol
ecystectomy is still widely advocated and standard in many departments
; however, it is controversial. We have developed a new diagnostic str
ategy for the detection of bile duct stones. The concept is based on a
n ultrasound examination and on screening for the presence of six risk
indicators of choledocholithiasis. A total of 120 patients undergoing
laparoscopic cholecystectomy were prospectively screened for the pres
ence of these six risk indicators: history of jaundice, history of pan
creatitis, hyperbilirubinemia, hyperamylasemia, dilated bile duct, and
unclear ultrasound findings. The sensitivity of ultrasound and intrao
perative cholangiography in diagnosing bile duct stones was also evalu
ated. For the detection of bile duct stones, the sensitivity was 77% f
or ultrasound and 100% for intraoperative cholangiography. Twenty perc
ent of all patients had at least one risk indicator. The presence of a
risk indicator correlated significantly with the presence of choledoc
holithiasis (P<0.01, chi-square test). The negative predictive value o
f the total set of risk indicators was 100%. Following our diagnostic
concept, we would have avoided 80% of intraoperative cholangiographies
without missing a stone in the bile duct. This study lends further su
pport to the view that routine use of intraoperative cholangiography i
s not necessary.