In 1860, the issue of slavery's status in the nation's territories rup
tured the national Democratic Party despite the party's long history o
f successfully compromising on the slavery issue. When southern Democr
ats walked out of the party's national convention and initiated the fo
rmation of an alternative national party organization, they anticipate
d the South's later secession from the Union. If southern Democrats wo
uld not remain within the Democratic Party and could not cooperate wit
h northern Democrats, there was little or no possibility that southern
ers would remain within the Union, since the national debate over slav
ery was much wider and more robust than the Democratic Party's interna
l discussion of that issue. While the Republicans' anti-slavery and an
ti-extension beliefs fundamentally challenged slavery's existence, nor
thern Democrats confined their disagreement with their southern collea
gues to the procedural dimension, i.e. to a discussion of what the Sup
reme Court had or had not decided in its 1857 Dred Scott decision and
what the national party had agreed in 1856. Therefore, the internal co
nflict within the national Democratic Party provides a new perspective
on secession, not because it reproduced the wider national disagreeme
nt about slavery, but precisely because it was so much narrower than t
hat national conflict.