M. Alcalay et al., PRELABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM - EARLY INDUCTION OF LABOR VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 70(2), 1996, pp. 129-133
Objectives: To compare expectant management with early induction of la
bour in pregnant patients with prelabour rupture of membranes at term
and unfavourable cervix. Study design: A prospective, randomised study
of 154 women with prelabour rupture of membranes at term of whom 80 h
ad been managed expectantly, and 74 had undergone oxytocin induction a
t a rate of 2.5 mU/min. Digital examination was not performed before o
xytocin infusion, and the first was delayed until 4 h (nulliparae), or
2 h (multiparae) of regular uterine contractions. Results: The mean p
eriod from rupture of membranes to delivery was significantly shorter
in the induction group. The mean duration of labour was significantly
shorter in the expectant group. Operative vaginal deliveries were more
common in the induction group, and fetal distress was the most common
cause of operative vaginal deliveries. The caesarean rates were low a
nd similar in both groups. Maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity
was similar and no difference was found in the length of hospitalisati
on. Conclusions: Expectant management in patients with ruptured membra
nes at term is safe and reduces the frequency of operative vaginal del
iveries. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.