De. Soltis et Rk. Kuzoff, DISCORDANCE BETWEEN NUCLEAR AND CHLOROPLAST PHYLOGENIES IN THE HEUCHERA GROUP (SAXIFRAGACEAE), Evolution, 49(4), 1995, pp. 727-742
Various factors, including taxon density, sampling error, convergence,
and heterogeneity of evolutionary rates, can potentially lead to inco
ngruence between phylogenetic trees based on different genomes. Partic
ularly at the generic level and below, chloroplast capture resulting f
rom hybridization may distort organismal relationships in phylogenetic
analyses based on the chloroplast genome, or genes included therein.
However, the extent of such discord between chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) tr
ees and those trees based on nuclear genes has rarely been assessed. W
e therefore used sequences of the internal transcribed spacer regions
(ITS-1 and ITS-2) of nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) to reconstruct phylo
genetic relationships among members of the Heuchera group of genera (S
axifragaceae). The Heuchera group presents an important model for the
analysis of chloroplast capture and its impact on phylogenetic reconst
ruction because hybridization is well documented within genera (e.g.,
Heuchera), and intergeneric hybrids involving six of the nine genera h
ave been reported. An earlier study provided a well-resolved phylogene
tic hypothesis for the Heuchera group based on cpDNA restriction-site
variation. However, trees based on ITS sequences are discordant with t
he cpDNA-based tree. Evidence from both morphology and nuclear-encoded
allozymes is consistent with the ITS trees, rather than the cpDNA tre
e, and several points of phylogenetic discord can clearly be attribute
d to chloroplast capture. Comparison of;the organellar and ITS trees a
lso raises the strong likelihood that ancient events of chloroplast ca
pture occurred between lineages during the early diversification of th
e Heuchera group. Thus, despite the many advantages and widespread use
of cpDNA data in phylogeny reconstruction, comparison of relationship
s based on cpDNA and ITS sequences for the Heuchera group underscores
the need for caution in the use of organellar variation for retrieving
phylogeny at lower taxonomic levels, particularly in groups noted for
hybridization.