OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of continuous infusion loop diuretics
in selected patient populations, discuss the advantages and disadvanta
ges associated with continuous infusion, and recommend monitoring para
meters for the use of continuous infusion therapy. Current dosing guid
elines for continuous infusion of loop diuretics have not been establi
shed, but a summary of previously studied doses is provided. DATA SOUR
CES: A literature search using MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical A
bstracts, as well as additional references found in pertinent articles
. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Clinical studies concerning the
use of loop diuretics administered by continuous infusion were evalua
ted in selected patient populations. All articles and clinical studies
were considered for possible inclusion in the review. Information jud
ged to be pertinent by the authors was selected for discussion. DATA S
YNTHESIS: Comparative studies in the congestive heart failure (CHF), r
enal-insufficient, and postcardiac surgery patient populations have sh
own that loop diuretics administered by continuous infusion are more b
eneficial than those given by intermittent bolus administration. In ad
ult patients with CHF, furosemide 3-4 mg/h is recommended In adult and
pediatric postcardiac surgery patients, furosemide dosages of 0.05 an
d 0.1. mg/kg/h have produced diuresis. In patients with renal insuffic
iency, bumetanide 0.912 mg/h has produced diuresis. Intravenous bolus
doses were used in all studies reviewed except 1. These studies have i
ndicated that continuous infusion of the loop diuretics yields diuresi
s without increasing toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The use of continuous infu
sion loop diuretics is a therapeutic alternative for patients requirin
g diuresis. This form of administration has provided more consistent u
rine flow, fewer alterations in fluid balances, fewer urinary losses o
f electrolytes as well as decreased dosage of the diuretic requirement
s. The disadvantages have not been fully elucidated because of the lim
ited evaluation of this administration method. Few studies have used t
his method of administration; however, the few data available indicate
that continuous infusion of loop diuretics is an efficacious alternat
ive to conventional therapy.