N. Tyemurray et al., EFFECTS OF TALKER FAMILIARITY ON COMMUNICATION BREAKDOWN IN CONVERSATIONS WITH ADULT COCHLEAR-IMPLANT USERS, Ear and hearing, 16(5), 1995, pp. 459-469
This investigation had three objectives: a) to determine the types of
repair strategies that cochlear-implant users implement to rectify com
munication breakdowns during ongoing conversation when talking to eith
er familiar or unfamiliar communication partners, b) to determine how
communication partners respond to particular types of repair strategie
s, and c) to describe the use of conversational behaviors that might c
ircumvent communication difficulties. In Experiment 1, cochlear-implan
t subjects were videotaped while talking to familiar and then unfamili
ar communication partners. In Experiment 2, a second group of cochlear
-implant subjects were videotaped while speaking with an unfamiliar pa
rtner for 6.5 minutes. Analysis of the videotapes revealed that the co
chlear-implant subjects in the two experiments most commonly asked ''w
hat?,'' ''huh?,'' or ''pardon?'' after not recognizing a spoken messag
e (e.g., following a communication breakdown), regardless of whether t
he communication partner was familiar or unfamiliar. Communication par
tners' most common response to this repair strategy was to repeat the
original message. When cochlear-implant subjects repeated back the seg
ment of a message that they understood, communication partners most of
ten confirmed or corrected them. When they requested information, comm
unication partners usually provided it. The cochlear-implant subjects
were more likely to use controlling conversational behaviors when inte
racting with unfamiliar than familiar communication partners. We concl
ude that repair strategy-response adjacency pairs may emerge during sp
ontaneous conversations. Use of both specific and nonspecific repair s
trategies may indicate cochlear-implant users' adherence to a cooperat
ive principle.