Cs. Maldonadoirizarry et Ae. Kelley, EXCITATORY AMINO-ACID RECEPTORS WITHIN NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS SUBREGIONS DIFFERENTIALLY MEDIATE SPATIAL-LEARNING IN THE RAT, Behavioural pharmacology, 6(5-6), 1995, pp. 527-539
The present experiments investigated the effects of excitatory amino a
cid antagonists, infused into core and shell subregions of the nucleus
accumbens, on spatial behavior in the rat. A food-search task was use
d, in which animals learn a specific pattern of food gathering; durati
on of each trial (time taken to gather all four pellets) and number of
errors (visits to empty holes) were measured. In experiment 1, animal
s first underwent training, and subsequently were given microinfusions
of either D-2-amino-5 phosphonopentanoic acid (AP-5), an N-methyl-D-a
spartate (NMDA) antagonist (0, 0.2, 1.0 mu g/0.5 mu l), or 6,7-dinitro
quinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX), an antagonist of lpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-
methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) and kainate receptors (0, 0.07
5, 0.75 mu g/0.5 mu l). AP-5 significantly increased trial duration in
both core and shell groups, but increased errors only in the core gro
up. DNQX treatment also impaired performance in both groups, but the e
ffect was greater in the core group compared with the shell group. In
experiment 2, animals were treated during acquisition. Rats infused wi
th AP-5 (1 mu g/0.5 mu l) took significantly longer to finish trials,
made more errors and showed a marked learning impairment across days.
AP-5 impaired learning in both core and shell groups, but the disrupti
on was significantly greater in the core group. DNQX (0.75 mu g/0.5 mu
l) also impaired learning when infused into the core during acquisiti
on; however the pattern of disruption contrasted markedly with that of
AP-5. DNQX in the shell had no effect on trial duration during learni
ng. It is hypothesized that both NMDA and non-NMDA receptors in the nu
cleus accumbens mediate spatial learning and performance, and that NMD
A receptors may have a relatively more important role in memory or ret
rieval mechanisms. Moreover, the core subregion may be preferentially
involved in the control of spatial behavior.