Y. Miyamoto et al., SAFETY AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF IOTROLAN IN HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY - RETENTION AND IRRITABILITY COMPARED WITH LIPIODOL, Investigative radiology, 30(9), 1995, pp. 538-543
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The authors compared the safety and pharmaco
kinetics of Iotrolan (water-soluble) in hysterosalpingography (HSG) wi
th those of Lipiodol (oil-soluble). METHODS. Iotrolan and Lipiodol wer
e administered intraperitoneally at doses of 100 mg iodine/kg to femal
e rabbits, Retention in the body was investigated by x-ray imaging, pl
asma kinetics, and urinary and fecal excretion, Irritability in the ab
domen was investigated by histologic examination. RESULTS. Iotrolan wa
s entirely excreted into the urine within 2 days after administration,
Conversely, Lipiodol was excreted into the urine, had a half-life of
50 days, and was retained for more than 21 days in the abdomen, Iotrol
an induced no inflammatory reaction in the abdomen, whereas Lipiodol i
nduced a marked abdominal inflammatory reaction, including granuloma f
ormation. Iotrolan had no effect on iodine concentration in the thyroi
d; Lipiodol increased iodine concentration significantly. CONCLUSIONS.
Iotrolan, which is a water-soluble and nonionic dimeric contrast medi
um, has potential greater safety for use in HSG than Lipiodol.