FLUORIDE VARNISH VERSUS ACIDULATED PHOSPHATE FLUORIDE GEL - A 5-YEAR CLINICAL-TRIAL

Citation
L. Seppa et al., FLUORIDE VARNISH VERSUS ACIDULATED PHOSPHATE FLUORIDE GEL - A 5-YEAR CLINICAL-TRIAL, Caries research, 29(5), 1995, pp. 327-330
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
ISSN journal
00086568
Volume
29
Issue
5
Year of publication
1995
Pages
327 - 330
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-6568(1995)29:5<327:FVVAPF>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
The aim of this trial was to compare the caries-preventive effect of s odium fluoride varnish and acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel. A total of 254 children aged 12-13 years with high past caries experienc e were randomly divided into two groups. The participants received sem i-annual applications of either fluoride varnish or APF gel for 3 year s. During the study, the mean (+/- SD) total DMFS increments of the va rnish and gel groups were 6.8+/-5.6 and 7.7+/-6.4, respectively, when initial caries was included, and 3.1+/-3.7 and 3.6+/-4.6 when initial caries was excluded. The difference was most evident on the approximal surfaces (varnish: 1.4+/-2.4; gel: 1.9+/-3.1). However, this differen ce was not statistically significant. Although larger studies are need ed for firm conclusions about the comparative effect of the two fluori de measures, the results suggest that fluoride varnish is as effective as fluoride gel at least in preventing approximal caries. Taking into account the shorter treatment time, using fluoride varnish for profes sional applications seems justified.