A body of experimental work performed by Israel Goldiamond and his col
leagues over 30 years ago is used to help define the evidential proble
ms raised for inferences concerning the causal efficacy of human thoug
ht. This work suggests that matches of public indicator responses of i
nferred private rules Dr states to experimenter score sheets may be co
nsidered only as weak evidence for causality. Further, the problems of
inferring causality raised by Wittgenstein's skeptical challenge, and
its implications for investigating the role of human thought in deter
mining human behavior, are briefly described. A selectionist approach,
which is currently being used by biobehavioral scientists to investig
ate the behavioral complexity which concerns Bandura (this issue) and
others, is suggested as one way to study the role of private events in
human behavior.