Traditionally the British legal system has taken a sceptical attitude
toward the testimony of children, reflected in the competency requirem
ent, the corroboration rule and the judicial caution. However, recent
psychological research has suggested that children, properly interview
ed, can provide invaluable testimony in securing convictions in cases
of sexual or physical abuse. Research suggests that children's spontan
eous accounts of events are generally accurate, and that suggestibilit
y can be greatly reduced by appropriate questioning techniques. Partly
as a result of such research, the legal hurdles surrounding children'
s evidence have been dismantled and procedural innovations, such as th
e use of the Videolink and videotaped interviews introduced. Empirical
research demonstrates the success of the Videolink and a similar eval
uation is planned for videotaped interviews. The latter has highlighte
d the need for a new research agenda which would include the impact of
biased or repeated questioning, and requests to children from abusers
to lie or keep secrets.