Scd. Grant et al., ANTITHYMOCYTE GLOBULIN PREPARATIONS AFTER HEART-TRANSPLANTATION - CYTOKINE RESPONSES IN-VIVO AND IN-VITRO, Transplantation, 60(7), 1995, pp. 684-689
It is accepted that antithymocyte globulin (ATG) preparations vary in
their bioactivity and side effects. However, this is poorly documented
in the literature. We compared the clinical course and cytokine respo
nse of heart transplant patients who had received either Merieux or St
anford ATG preparations. The serum cytokine response (interleukin [IL]
-6, tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-alpha, IL-4, and IL-10) of 28 consecut
ive heart transplant recipients was measured for 14 days after surgery
using ELISAs. The effect of various ATC; preparations on cytokine sti
mulation of whole blood in vitro was also evaluated. There was a much
greater in vivo IL-6 and TNF-alpha response to Merieux than to Stanfor
d ATG (P<0.0005). There was little IL-4 or IL-10 response with either
preparation. No side effects could be attributed to either treatment.
No significant difference was seen in the frequency of rejection at 30
, 90, or 365 days. More infection episodes occurred in the group treat
ed with Stanford ATG; at 30 days (0.5 compared with 0.2 episodes/patie
nt; P=0.097), 90 days (1.2 compared with 0.5 episodes/patient; P=0.17)
, and 365 days (2.8 compared with 1.8; P=0.59), although none of these
differences were statistically significant. When tested in vitro for
cytokine stimulation, the in vivo pattern was confirmed, with Merieux
ATG producing greater levels of TNF-alpha and IL-6 than Stanford ATG.
The differences in cytokine stimulation may be reflected in different
immunosuppressive activities. Further research to elucidate the import
ant components of immunosuppressive activity while excluding potential
ly detrimental effects is important.