The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity of subjecti
ve faculty evaluations (1) in detecting the levels of clinical compete
nce exhibited by third-year medical students in a junior clerkship and
(2) in correlating with objective measures of the students' performan
ce. Forty-eight third-year medical students were evaluated during the
course of a 10-week surgery clerkship. Each student was subjectively e
valuated by four surgery faculty members and by a number of objective
measures. Unlike the subjective evaluations, the objective testing cle
arly demonstrated students' deficiencies. None of the seven students i
dentified as underachieving by the battery of objective tests was iden
tified as deficient by any of the faculty evaluators. The subjective s
cores in this study did not correlate highly with objective tests of e
ither knowledge or performance. Reliance on subjective clinical evalua
tions as the sole measure of clinical ability is clearly not warranted
. To better define clinical competence in the medical student and resi
dent population, we must de-emphasize subjective faculty evaluations a
nd place greater importance on objective tests.