In this paper four cases are presented to illustrate how interrogative
pressure can result in marked lowering of subjects' suggestible and c
ompliant behaviour during interrogation. This means that subjects resp
ond to the pressure by becoming less suggestible and less compliant, w
hich is in complete opposition to that intended by the interrogator. T
his can be interpreted within a two-process theory as an effective dis
continuation of reactive behaviour and a sudden activation of strategi
c coping. In two of the cases, which involved real-life interrogations
, police pressure resulted in a ''boomerang'' reaction and a retractio
n of an already made confession to murder. Anger and a sense of injust
ice are seen as important components to such a reaction. However, stra
tegic coping during interrogation can also be activated by sudden chan
ge in critical thinking.