This paper discusses the research and theoretical underpinnings of sta
tement analysis techniques for credibility assessment purposes with cr
iminal suspects. Although the principles of statement analysis have lo
ng been recognized, only recently have specific techniques been formal
ized. It is argued that, in seeking patterns of verbal deception in th
e interrogation context it is necessary to integrate theories consider
ing emotional, motivational, cognitive, and linguistic factors. Approa
ches emphasizing memory suggest that there exist systematic difference
s between accurate and inaccurate memory accounts. Approaches emphasiz
ing deception indicate that discernible differences may exist between
truthful and dishonest language behaviors. Directions for future resea
rch are described focussing on the need for eclectic strategies with b
oth experimental and field studies.