Ce. Ng et al., CROSS-SENSITIVITY TO X-RADIATION AND TYPE-I AND TYPE-II DNA TOPOISOMERASE INHIBITORS IN A RANGE OF HUMAN AND RODENT CELL-LINES, International journal of oncology, 7(5), 1995, pp. 1179-1184
We compared the relative X-radiation response of confluent (i.e. essen
tially non-proliferating) cultures of three human tumor (U-87MG, Mel-3
, HT-144), one human normal (AG1522) and two rodent normal (AA8, V3) c
ell lines to their relative sensitivities to a DNA topoisomerase (topo
) II poison (etoposide) and to a topo I poison (camptothecin). The rel
ative sensitivity of these cell lines to etoposide (for 8 h exposure a
t 37 degrees C) is extremely similar to their relative X-radiation sen
sitivity, suggesting a direct correlation between X-radiation sensitiv
ity and susceptibility to killing by topo II poison. The relative sens
itivities of these cell lines to camptothecin (also 8 h, 37 degrees C
exposure) also agree generally with their relative X-radiation sensiti
vities although the correlation is not as good as for etoposide. In ad
dition, exponential phase (i.e, actively proliferating) cultures of th
e radiosensitive HT-144 cells are more susceptible to killing by both
etoposide and camptothecin than the radioresistant Mel-3, confirming p
reviously reported cross-sensitivities between X-radiation and topo po
isons in actively proliferating cultures of other types of cell lines.
Hence our results suggest that the previously reported cross-sensitiv
ity between topo II poisons and X-radiation in actively proliferating
rodent cell lines is also observed in 'non-proliferating' rodent and h
uman cell lines. Additionally, there is cross-sensitivity between topo
I poisons and X-radiation in both rodent and human cell lines as well
.