Ds. James et Ad. Bull, DEATH CERTIFICATION - IS CORRECT FORMULATION OF CAUSE OF DEATH RELATED TO SENIORITY OR EXPERIENCE, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 29(5), 1995, pp. 424-428
We looked at a series of death certificates completed by various grade
s of hospital clinicians, general practitioners (GPs) and pathologists
. Specific error types were defined and identified in each group. In h
ospital it is still the pre-registration house officer who completes m
ost of the death certificates. Senior hospital doctors make more error
s than their juniors while GPs and pathologists make fewest errors. Ev
en amongst pathologists 11% of certificates recorded no adequate under
lying cause of death, 85.7% failed to record organisms identified and
76.7% failed to record the site or histological type of tumours. This
agrees with other studies that show that inaccuracies in death certifi
cates arise from inadequate formulation of cause of death and failure
to record relevant information. It reveals that little heed has been p
aid to the recommendation in the joint report of the Royal College of
Physicians and Pathologists that senior doctors should be more involve
d in certification-the frequency of errors in this group suggests that
it might not, in any case, lead to a great improvement. The number of
errors made by GPs and pathologists suggests that even practitioners
with clinical experience and regular exposure to certification frequen
tly make errors. The reasons for this are discussed and possible solut
ions proposed.