VARYING NICOTINE PATCH DOSE AND TYPE OF SMOKING CESSATION COUNSELING

Citation
De. Jorenby et al., VARYING NICOTINE PATCH DOSE AND TYPE OF SMOKING CESSATION COUNSELING, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 274(17), 1995, pp. 1347-1352
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
00987484
Volume
274
Issue
17
Year of publication
1995
Pages
1347 - 1352
Database
ISI
SICI code
0098-7484(1995)274:17<1347:VNPDAT>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Objective.-To compare the efficacy and safety of 22-mg and 44-mg doses of transdermal nicotine therapy. when it is paired with minimal, indi vidual, or group counseling to improve smoking cessation rates. Design .-An 8-week clinical trial (4 weeks double-blind followed by 4 weeks o pen label) using random assignment of participants to both dose (22 or 44 mg) and counseling (minimal, individual, or group) conditions. Par ticipants.-Daily cigarette smokers (greater than or equal to 15 cigare ttes per day for at least 1 year) who volunteered to participate in a study of smoking cessation treatment. A total of 504 participants were enrolled at two sites. Intervention.-Four weeks of 22- or 44-mg trans dermal nicotine therapy followed by 4 weeks of dosage reduction (2 wee ks of 22 mg followed by 2 weeks of 11 mg). Counseling consisted of a s elf-help pamphlet (minimal); a self-help pamphlet, a brief physician m otivational message, and three brief (<15 minutes) follow-up visits wi th a nurse (individual); or the pamphlet, the motivational message, an d eight weekly 1-hour group smoking cessation counseling visits (group ). All participants returned weekly to turn in questionnaires and for assessment of their smoking status. Main Outcome Measures.-Abstinence from smoking was based on self-report, confirmed by an expired carbon monoxide concentration lower than 10 ppm. Withdrawal severity was asse ssed by means of an eight-item self-report questionnaire completed dai ly. Results.-Smoking cessation rates for the two nicotine patch doses and three levels of counseling did not differ significantly at either 8 weeks or 26 weeks following the quit date. Among those receiving min imal contact, the 44-mg dose produced greater abstinence at 4 weeks th an did the 22-mg dose (68% vs 45%; P<.01). Participants receiving mini mal-contact adjuvant treatment were less likely to be abstinent at the end of 4 weeks than those receiving individual or group counseling (5 6% vs 67%; P<.05), The 44-mg dose decreased desire to smoke more than the 22-mg dose, but this effect was not related to success in quitting smoking. Transdermal nicotine therapy at doses of 44 mg produced a si gnificantly greater frequency of nausea (28%), vomiting (10%), and ery thema with edema at the patch site (30%) than did a 22-mg dose (10%, 2 %, and 13%, respectively; P<.01 for each adverse effect). Three seriou s adverse events occurred during use of the 44-mg patch dose. Conclusi ons.-There does not appear to be any general, sustained benefit of ini tiating transdermal nicotine therapy with a 44-mg patch dose or of pro viding intense adjuvant smoking cessation treatment. The two doses and all adjuvant treatments produced equivalent effects at the 26-week fo llow-up, and the higher patch dose produced more adverse effects. High er-dose (44-mg) nicotine replacement does not appear to be indicated f or general clinical populations, although it may provide short-term be nefit to some smokers attempting to quit with minimal adjuvant treatme nt.