Although it is now well accepted that attention-based cognitive coping
strategies are effective in altering pain perception and have potenti
ally useful analgesic qualities, there exists contradiction and equivo
cation as to the role of various factors in the production of that ana
lgesia. Cioffi (1991) has suggested that the response to this equivoca
tion has been a 'collective ennui' on the part of researchers. This ar
ticle seeks to explore methodological and theoretical reasons for this
reigning equivocation and offers some suggestions for moving beyond i
t. In particular, critical attention is focussed upon four possible so
urces of variance in experimental pain procedures: the choice of the p
ain induction procedure, the instructions given, the measures taken an
d the content of the taught strategy.