Rc. Herschler et al., PRODUCTION RESPONSES TO VARIOUS DOSES AND RATIOS OF ESTRADIOL BENZOATE AND TRENBOLONE ACETATE IMPLANTS IN STEERS AND HEIFERS, Journal of animal science, 73(10), 1995, pp. 2873-2881
At each of three locations, 400 steers and an equal number of heifers
were randomized to 10 treatment groups. The purpose of the studies was
to evaluate the response of feedlot steers and heifers to single impl
ants containing a combination of estradiol benzoate (EB) and trenbolon
e acetate (TEA) at two different ratios each at three doses. The selec
ted ratios corresponded to 1E(2)(estradiol-17 beta):5TBA and 1E(2): 10
TBA. The two ratios were each tested at three different EB/TBA doses (
1:5 at 20/70, 40/140, and 60 mg/210 mg, 1:10 at 14/100, 28/200, and 42
mg/300 mg). The test groups were compared to those given each of the
compounds alone (60 mg of EB or 300 mg of TEA), as well as to groups r
eimplanted with Synovex S(R) or Synovex H(R) implants and untreated co
ntrols. Steers (P <.01) and heifers (P <.05) implanted with the 1:10 E
(2):TBA implants gained faster and had better feed conversion (FC) tha
n their counterparts given 1:5 E(2):TBA over the 140-d trial. The resu
lts indicated that both estradiol benzoate and trenbolone acetate cont
ributed to the efficacy of the combination implant. Contour plots of A
DG and FC indicate that increasing the amount of EB above approximatel
y 36 or 37 mg does not significantly increase the response of steers.
The results of these studies indicate that the 28 EB/200 TEA dose is c
lose to optimal for growth promotion and feed conversion in both heife
rs and steers. In steers, carcass value was increased (P <.01) in all
test groups except the group given TEA only. Despite a slight reductio
n in marbling score and percentage of Choice carcasses, carcasses of s
teers treated with either 28 mg of EB/200 mg of TEA or 42 mg of EB/300
mg of TEA were more valuable (P <.05) than carcasses from steers in a
ny of the 1:10 ratio EB/TBA groups. Carcass values for groups reimplan
ted with Synovex S or Synovex H or implanted with EB alone were not si
gnificantly different from those for groups implanted with any dose of
the 1:10 EB/TBA ratio.