A 1.5-h satellite video program was developed for a statewide Beef Qua
lity Assurance (BQA) producer education activity. Twenty-seven downlin
k sites were identified across the state, and additional known downlin
k sites included one each in Minnesota, Indiana, and Monterrey, Mexico
. The videoconference was formally evaluated by viewers and resource p
eople at each site. Program participants included representatives of t
he Ohio and National Cattlemen's Associations and two producers curren
tly implementing BQA programs. A toll-free telephone number was availa
ble for viewers' questions during the last 15 min of air time and foll
owing the video program. A demographic data form and pre- and postconf
erence evaluations were completed by 368 participants. Twenty-seven pe
rcent of the respondents were age 56 or older; 76% were age 36 or olde
r. A one to five scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree) was used
for evaluation. Beef Quality Assurance was considered by viewers to be
an important consideration for the future in pre- (mean = 4.5, SD = .
99) and post-evaluations (mean = 4.6, SD = .83). The mean response to
the question regarding using more videoconferencing for agriculture pr
ograming was 3.9 (SD = .91). Four percent of participants indicated le
ss or no videoconferencing should be used, 24% were neutral, and 72% f
elt more videoconferencing should be done. Comments were neutral with
regard to the length of the conference (mean = 3.5, SD = .86) and the
complexity of the subject matter (mean = 3.1, SD = .64). More than 88%
of the participants agreed or strongly agreed that they intended to e
xamine their overall production strategies to see where they could imp
rove the quality of beef they produce (mean = 4.3, SD = .85). After th
e videoconference, 2.6% of respondents still strongly believed that BQ
A was not an important consideration for the future of the beef indust
ry. The cost of all activities associated with this satellite video pr
ogram was $13,000.