J. Hopwood et H. Mallinson, CHLAMYDIA TESTING IN COMMUNITY CLINICS - A FOCUS FOR ACCURATE SEXUAL HEALTH-CARE, British journal of family planning, 21(3), 1995, pp. 87-90
As judged by testing women in community clinics at the time of their c
ervical smear; a substantial number of chlamydial infections exists in
Liverpool but the vast majority of these infections would have been m
issed by current practice which relies on patients complaining of symp
toms. One hundred and sixty four women who spontaneously reported symp
toms or with risk factors for sexually transmitted diseases were refer
red directly from the community clinics to the department of Genitouri
nary Medicine (GUM) for investigation. One thousand one hundred and se
venty women aged between 16 and 25 years were screened for chlamydial
infection in the clinics. Of these, 295 (25 percent) eventually admitt
ed to having symptoms suggestive of infection during the consultation
and had a chlamydia positive rate (7.1 per cent) equal to that in the
women referred directly to GUM. The overall positive rate for those sc
reened was 4.9 per cent. In those without symptoms or signs, selection
on one or more of six parameters identified a significantly higher ch
lamydia positive rate (9.3 per cent) than in the remainder of the grou
p (3.2 per cent) and women using the male condom alone for contracepti
on had the lowest positive rate (2.5 per cent). There was a substantia
l delay in some women reaching the department of GUM for treatment One
case of gonorrhoea was found during the study. Offering a community c
linic test for chlamydia has provided a focus for discussing reproduct
ive health with both the women themselves and their health care provid
ers and purchasers.