This paper presents four different methods to estimate the uncertainty
in a low-head hydropower system involving the parametric study on the
performance of cross-flow turbines. The study considered for uncertai
nty estimation here, involved the computation of maximum experimental
efficiency using the measured data of shaft torque, rotational speed,
water flow rate, total head, and water temperature. Commercial brochur
es published by the turbine manufacturers often fail to mention the un
certainty in their claimed maximum efficiency. This often leads to an
overestimate in the maximum efficiency, hence the importance of estima
ting the uncertainty. If uncertainty is estimated by using only one me
thod, there will not be any verification for the estimated uncertainty
. Therefore, in this paper four different approaches are adopted for e
stimating the uncertainty so that they can be mutually verified. The f
our methods are: confidence limit analogy, critical path method analog
y, multivariate Taylor series method, and sensitivity analysis. All th
e methods provide uncertainty estimates in both the positive and negat
ive directions except the confidence limit analogy method which yields
uncertainty estimate only in the negative direction. In spite of the
totally different approach used in each of the methods, the uncertaint
y estimates compare reasonably well.