This article argues that different insurance marketing organizations a
rise as a means to minimize the costs of correctly matching policyhold
er risks with insurance coverage. When policyholders are easily sorted
without sales agent participation in screening, exclusive dealing wil
l be the preferred marketing organization; when agent information is i
mportant for risk placement, independent agency may be preferred. Empi
rical support for our theory is obtained from analysis of compensation
contracts and market shares of the different marketing forms. Exclusi
ve dealers are found to be prevalent in relatively standardized, homog
eneous product lines and markets, and their agents receive less profit
-based compensation than those of independent agency insurers. These f
indings are consistent with our theory.