Ej. Rutherford et al., EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PNEUMOCOCCAL REVACCINATION AFTER SPLENECTOMY FOR TRAUMA, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 39(3), 1995, pp. 448-452
Objective: To assess the outcome of patient education after splenectom
y and vaccination and to determine the safety and efficacy of pneumoco
ccal revaccination 2 or more years after primary vaccination. Main Out
come Measures: Titers to serotype no, 6 and no, 23 pneumococcus and cu
taneous and systemic reaction to revaccination. Results: A total of 11
2 consecutive postsplenectomy patients receiving pneumococcal vaccine
were identified; 45 were contacted and offered revaccination; 24 patie
nts demonstrated a lack of understanding of the postsplenectomy state
(unaware of splenectomy n = 2, unaware of splenectomy risk n = 8, unaw
are of vaccine n = 23); 3 patients had infections requiring hospitaliz
ation (pneumonia, strep throat and tonsillitis, pneumonia and bacterem
ia); 40 patients agreed to revaccination, and 33 patients returned for
follow-up titers; 16 of 33 (48%) demonstrated at least a two-fold inc
rease in at least one titer, Only 15% described the revaccination as w
orse than a tetanus shot. Conclusions: (1) Despite physician-patient c
onversations, pamphlets, and Medic Alert bracelets, patient retention
was poor. (2) All splenectomy patients should be revaccinated and reed
ucated between two and six years after splenectomy. (3) Revaccination
after two years was well tolerated. (4) There were no fatal episodes o
f pneumococcal sepsis in over 200 patient years.