LAPAROSCOPY IN 121 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH ABDOMINAL GUNSHOT WOUNDS

Citation
Jl. Sosa et al., LAPAROSCOPY IN 121 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH ABDOMINAL GUNSHOT WOUNDS, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 39(3), 1995, pp. 501-506
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
Volume
39
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
501 - 506
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in:a large group of stable patients with abdominal gunshot wounds (ABGSWs). Design: This study was a prospective case series developed by managem ent protocol. Materials and Methods: In a 21/2-year period, DL was per formed in 121 consecutive patients who were hemodynamically stable wit h ABGSWs and met protocol criteria. This represented 18% of all patien ts with ABGSWs seen in this period at the Ryder Trauma Center. The eva luation was conducted to determine peritoneal violation, the presence of intra-abdominal blood, and the need for exploration. Measurements a nd Main Results: There were 42 (35%) positive and 79 (65%) negative DL s. In patients with positive DL, 39 (92.8%) had exploratory laparotomy . In this group, 32 (82%) had therapeutic laparotomy, 6 (15.4%) had no ntherapeutic laparotomy, and 1 (2.5%): had a negative laparotomy. In t his patient, DL was felt to be inadequate by the attending surgeon, al though no penetration or intraperitoneal blood were present, and a neg ative laparotomy was done. This represents a failure rate of 0.8%. The re were 3 (7.2%); positive DLs, in whom laparotomy was not performed. These patients. had isolated nonbleeding liver injuries; and nontherap eutic laparotomy was successfully avoided, The negative DL group was d ivided into 47 patients (60%) with isolated ABGSWs, and 32 patients (4 0%) with associated injuries; mostly orthopedic and thoracic; There we re no false-negative DLs and no delayed laparotomies in these 121 pati ents. There was no mortality in this study group. The sensitivity for peritoneal penetration was 100%; and the specificity was 98.7%. The po sitive predictive value was 97.6%, and the negative predictive value w as 100%; In deciding on need for laparotomy (i.e., injury requiring re pair), DL had a positive predictive value of 82%; more importantly, th e negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusions: In stable patients with ABGSWs and questionable intra-abdominal injury; DL can be safely used. It is highly sensitive and specific. It can effectively reduce t he incidence of negative and nontherapeutic laparotomies; and the over all morbidity and hospital stay in this group of patients.