Socially shared symbols play an important role in human life. In concr
ete, condensed and vivid ways, they express core values, beliefs and i
deals and thereby function within the context of group relations. The
present paper analyses how and why social symbols are powerful for mob
ilisation of public support, using material collected during the Gulf-
Crisis in 1991. It is argued that social symbols can be conceptualised
as social representations. This conceptualisation provides a fruitful
framework for studying the nature and functions of social symbols. Ho
wever, it is suggested that the study of symbols may also contribute t
o the development of the theory of social representations. Following B
illig (1993), it is shown, first, that transcendentalisation as a coun
ter-process of objectification is crucial for understanding social sym
bolism. Second, it is shown how symbols function within an argumentati
ve context suggesting that the study of argumentation can be an import
ant component of the study of social representations.