MEASUREMENT OF TOTAL PROTEIN IS NOT SUITA BLE FOR DIAGNOSING HYPOALBUMINEMIA IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS

Citation
S. Zielmann et al., MEASUREMENT OF TOTAL PROTEIN IS NOT SUITA BLE FOR DIAGNOSING HYPOALBUMINEMIA IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS, Anasthesist, 44(10), 1995, pp. 700-704
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00032417
Volume
44
Issue
10
Year of publication
1995
Pages
700 - 704
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-2417(1995)44:10<700:MOTPIN>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
In clinical practice, the administration of supplementary albumin ofte n depends on the measured plasma concentration of total protein (TPC), A TPC of less than 5 g/dl is generally accepted as an indication for albumin therapy, assuming an albumin concentration of less than 2.5 g/ dl. However, a physiological relation between TPC and albumin cannot b e expected in critically ill patients, and thus, measurement of TPC ma y be misleading as an indicator for the use of albumin, Therefore, we investigated the sensitivity and specificity of TPC testing for diagno sing hypoalbuminaemia requiring treatment. Methods. In this prospectiv e study, 210 consecutive patients were included. Protein electrophores is was performed three times a week; the second electrophoresis was se lected for evaluation. Applied statistical analysis revealed the numbe r of positive total protein tests indicating hypalbuminaemia requiring treatment (sensitivity) and the number of negative with tolerably red uced albumin concentrations (specificity). Results. Of the investigate d patients, 27.6% had normal TPCs between 6.2 and 8.0 g/dl, In 81.9% o f cases an albumin concentration below 3.5 g/dl was found, while 43 pa tients had a concentration below 2.5 g/dl. The sensitivity and specifi city of TPC measurement for the diagnosis of clinically relevant hypoa lbuminaemia (albumin concentration <2.5 g/dl) was calculated at differ ent cutoff points for total protein. With a TPC of 6.0 g/dl, the sensi tivity was 0.96 and the specificity 0.44. With a cutoff point of 5.0 g /dl, the sensitivity was reduced to 0.65 and specificity increased to 0.86, Finally, with a TPC of 4.0 g/dl sensitivity was 0.25 and specifi city almost 1. Conclusions. Depending on the cutoff point for TPC, a r elevant albumin requirement would frequently not be detected. In other cases. a need for albumin would be assumed from a reduced TPC even th ough the albumin concentration still exceeded 2.5 g/dl. Therefore, det ermination of TPC is not a suitable indicator of the need for albumin replacement. As a result, we suggest routine determination of albumin concentrations instead of TPC.