DETECTION OF ROSS-RIVER-VIRUS IN CLINICAL-SAMPLES USING A NESTED REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION-POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION

Citation
Ln. Sellner et al., DETECTION OF ROSS-RIVER-VIRUS IN CLINICAL-SAMPLES USING A NESTED REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION-POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION, Clinical and diagnostic virology, 4(3), 1995, pp. 257-267
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Virology
ISSN journal
09280197
Volume
4
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
257 - 267
Database
ISI
SICI code
0928-0197(1995)4:3<257:DORICU>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Background: Ross River virus (RRV) is a mosquito borne alphavirus that has been found in Australia, Papua New Guinea and the Pacific Islands . It is the aetiological agent of epidemic polyarthritis, a debilitati ng illness whose symptoms are arthritis, arthralgia, lethargy, rash an d fever which may persist for weeks or months. Diagnosis is made on a serological basis, but in many cases is presumptive rather than defini te. Objectives: To apply the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect ion of RRV in human sera to assess its suitability for application in disease diagnosis. Study design: Sensitivity of the nested RT-PCR assa y was determined by detection of virus of known titre diluted in uninf ected serum. Clinical serum samples from patients serologically diagno sed of having RRV infection were tested by nested RT-PCR to assess its diagnostic value. Results: Sensitivity of the nested RT-PCR assay was determined to be detection of 0.01 PFU of virus stock in 100 mu l ser um. Clinical samples tested showed that 10 of 26 (38%) serum samples w ith low or negative (non-diagnostic) virus-specific antibody titres we re PCR-positive, whereas all 22 specimens with high antibody titres we re PCR-negative. PCR positivity was unaffected by repeated freezing an d thawing of samples. Conclusions: While PCR cannot replace serology a s a means of RRV diagnosis, it may be useful in conjunction with serol ogical testing, particularly for forming definitive diagnoses in those samples with low (inconclusive) antibody titres. It is faster and mor e sensitive than virus isolation by tissue culture, and could also pro ve useful in investigations of disease pathogenesis.