PHARMACOKINETICS OF MEXILETINE ENANTIOMERS IN HEALTHY-HUMAN SUBJECTS - A STUDY OF THE IN-VIVO SERUM-PROTEIN BINDING, SALIVARY EXCRETION ANDRED-BLOOD-CELL DISTRIBUTION OF THE ENANTIOMERS
Dw. Kwok et al., PHARMACOKINETICS OF MEXILETINE ENANTIOMERS IN HEALTHY-HUMAN SUBJECTS - A STUDY OF THE IN-VIVO SERUM-PROTEIN BINDING, SALIVARY EXCRETION ANDRED-BLOOD-CELL DISTRIBUTION OF THE ENANTIOMERS, Xenobiotica, 25(10), 1995, pp. 1127-1142
1. The disposition kinetics of serum free (unbound) and total mexileti
ne enantiomers were studied in 12 healthy subjects following oral admi
nistration of 200mg racemic mexiletine hydrochloride. The disposition
of the enantiomers of mexiletine in urine, saliva, and red blood cells
was also examined. 2. The mean peak serum total mexiletine concentrat
ion of 217 +/- 69 ng/ml for R(-)-mexiletine was found to be significan
tly greater than a mean of 197 +/- 56 ng/ml for S(+)-mexiletine. The m
ean serum total R(-)-mexiletine concentrations were also found to be s
ignificantly greater than those for S(+)-mexiletine during the first 6
h following drug administration. The oral absorption, as well as the
rapid and the terminal disposition kinetic parameters between the mexi
letine enantiomers, were not significantly different. 3. Comparative i
n vitro serum protein binding of mexiletine enantiomers examined by ul
trafiltration and equilibrium dialysis indicated a pH-dependent stereo
selective binding of the enantiomers to serum proteins. A serum pH ran
ging from 6.3 to 9.4 was found to correlate with serum protein binding
of the enantiomers from approximately 30-80% respectively. Within the
same serum pH range, the serum free drug R(-)/S(+) ratios were found
to decrease from 1.0 to 0.7 respectively. At serum pH7.4, a mean serum
free fraction of 0.57 +/- 0.7 and 0.56 +/- 0.6 were observed for R(-)
and S(+)-mexiletine respectively. 4. The overall mean saliva/serum-fr
ee mexiletine enantiomer area under the concentration-time curve ratio
s of 6.10 +/- 2.82 and 7.49 +/- 3.48 for R(-)- and S(+)-mexiletine res
pectively were found to be significantly different. The overall mean s
aliva R(-)IS(+) enantiomer ratio of 0.89 +/- 0.02 (mean +/- SE) over 4
8h suggested a stereoselective disposition of the mexiletine enantiome
rs in saliva. 5. The mean mexiletine red blood cells to serum-free dru
g concentration ratios among 11 subjects studied were found to range f
rom 0.6 to 1.4 for R(-)-mexiletine and from 0.6 to 1.8 for S(+)-mexile
tine. The overall mean ratios of 0.85 +/- 0.06 and 0.84 +/- 0.08 (mean
+ SE) over 48 h for R(-)- and S(+)-mexiletine respectively were both
slightly but significantly different from unity. This data together wi
th an overall red blood cell mean R(-)/S(+)-mexiletine concentration r
atio of 0.91 +/- 0.13 suggested a non-stereoselective and passive diff
usion of the enantiomers into red blood cells. 6. The cumulative amoun
ts of unchanged R(-)- and S(+)-mexiletine in the urine were found to b
e variable among the 12 subjects with a mean percent urinary recovery
of 3.49 +/- 3.35% for R(-)-mexiletine and 3.68 +/- 3.94% for S(+)-mexi
letine.